There is an African adage that say '' ire je o si ninu photo bi o ba se duro lo se ma ba ara re, meaning'' there is no alteration in photo image'' (I believe I got the interpretation right). But the adage, i believe, is not relevant again, thanks to Photoshop. The entrance of Photoshop brings about new development in Photography and the rest, they say, is history, though sometimes it encourage laziness(my view, though). Is there any limit to Photoshop or can it be abuse? Check the pictures below:
Check Behati Prinsloo's left foot in this photo. Her left foot is wonky and several toes is missing. |
| Before and After What happen to this model waist after she undergo Photoshop surgery? Any difference? Check her waist before and after  The model appears to have a thumb emerge directly out of her arm, above the wrist.  Take a deep look at this model's breast, any difference? The right breast was enhanced and the other was not given the extra lift and the result ......  This is a case of horrible Photoshop. Only half of the bike can be seen or can we assume that this model's backside cover up the entire half of the bike.  The female model's legs seem to have gone missing in this picture... or perhaps the male model's biceps are so big they conceal them.  This is funny, I mean so funny; model Irina Shayk claims that she never posed in the buff and that GQ Spain Photoshopped the underwear right off of her .  This is another Photoshop faux-pas. How can an entire face disappear from a 45 degree view?  This is an act of optical illusion,if I am right, because it look as if there is no horse behind the model.  Retouching madness, did I hear you say? How on earth can this Photoshop abuser give this poor model only one leg. Photo Credit: Huff Post |
No comments:
Post a Comment